Do I need to name an external evaluator before my grant is funded?

Direct Answer

Whether you need to name an external evaluator in your proposal depends on the funder's requirements or preferences and your institution's procurement policies. When possible, naming an evaluator in the proposal is a good idea. You get to know the evaluator you want to work with (this is a relationship over the next 1-6 years), they provide expertise during the proposal process and often write the evaluation section of the proposal, and they ensure the scope of work and the budget are aligned. Many funders prefer this arrangement as it shows that the PIs take the evaluation seriously. An MOU or letter of commitment can document an evaluator's intended involvement without establishing a formal contract until after a funding award is made. However, some institutions require a competitive bidding process after the grant is awarded, which can prevent project teams from naming an evaluator in advance. In that case, the proposal may instead describe how the evaluator will be selected. Even when an evaluator cannot be formally named, involving evaluation expertise during proposal development can help ensure the evaluation questions, methods, timeline, and budget are realistic and appropriate for the project.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Co-founder and workforce development consultant, Grantibly

Best Move

Before you write the evaluation section, ask your grants office whether you can name an evaluator now or must select one through a competitive process after the award.

Why It Works

You'll know whether you can identify an evaluator in the proposal, document an intended relationship through an MOU or letter of commitment, or describe how an evaluator will be selected. Involving evaluation expertise early can strengthen the proposed evaluation plan.

Next Step

Review the solicitation's evaluation and budget requirements, then discuss your options for involving an evaluator during proposal development with your grants office.

What you need to know

Whether you can name an evaluator before funding depends on both the funder's requirements and your institution's rules for selecting one.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D., Grantibly

What does the proposal need if I name an evaluator?

If you name an evaluator in your proposal, include what your solicitation asks for about them, such as their role, their qualifications for this project, and the cost of their work. Here's one example of how specific a funder can be. NSF's Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program asks for a named evaluator's biographical sketch in NSF's format. It also requires the budget to include funds for an evaluator who is independent of the project. If your solicitation asks for a letter from the evaluator, follow the format it gives.

What if my institution won't let me choose an evaluator before the award?

If your institution won't let you choose an evaluator before the award, describe in the proposal how the evaluator will be selected afterward. Some institutions require consultants, including evaluators, to be chosen through a competitive bid once a grant is funded, and some funders allow for that. NSF's ATE program, for example, asks you to note the policy and describe the procedure you'll use to select an evaluator after the award. Check with your grants office before you write the section, so the proposal matches what your institution will actually allow.

Why name an evaluator early if I don't have to?

Naming an evaluator early can strengthen your proposal by showing reviewers who will conduct the evaluation and why they're qualified. More importantly, involving an evaluator during proposal development allows them to help design the evaluation questions, methods, timeline, and budget so the plan is appropriate for the project and feasible to carry out. Even when institutional procurement policies prevent you from formally naming an evaluator, seeking evaluation expertise early can improve the proposal. What can an evaluator actually do for me before I submit the proposal? explains that work in more detail, and How do I find an external evaluator for my federal grant? offers guidance on finding one.

The Grantibly perspective

Lauren's perspective

In our business, the last thing we want to be is an evaluator who only shows up to ask for data, writes a report, and disappears. That's not a good evaluation partner.

A good evaluation partner should be willing to raise questions, identify concerns, challenge assumptions, and share findings that may be uncomfortable. We do that because we want the project to succeed, not just satisfy its reporting requirements. Establishing this relationship in the proposal phase means that the evaluator can contribute to and give feedback on the project itself and make sure that the evaluation plan and project goals, activities, and outcomes align.

The relationship you have with your evaluator should make the evaluation stronger and help you use what you learn to make the project better.

More questions about this topic

Can someone from my own institution be the external evaluator?

Someone from your own institution can sometimes be the external evaluator, depending on your funder's requirements for independence. NSF's ATE program, for example, allows an evaluator from the same institution if they work in a separate unit with a different reporting line. However, there are advantages to working with an independent evaluator from outside your institution. They can bring a fresh perspective, experience working across different organizations and programs, and greater distance from institutional relationships and pressures that might influence the evaluation. Can our internal institutional researcher do the evaluation to save money? looks at the tradeoffs.

Does the evaluator's cost go in the proposal budget?

If the grant will pay for the evaluation, the evaluator's cost goes in the proposal budget, even if you'll choose the evaluator after the award. How much of my grant budget should go to evaluation? covers how to estimate it.

What if the evaluator I named can't do the work after the award?

If the evaluator named in your proposal can no longer do the work, check with your program officer before selecting a replacement. Depending on the funder's requirements, changing a named evaluator may require approval, particularly if the evaluator's qualifications or role were part of the approved proposal.

Who at my institution should I ask about these rules?

Ask your institution's grants or sponsored programs office or the procurement office about the rules for naming an evaluator, and ask whether the purchasing or procurement office needs to be involved if a competitive bid might be required.

Related pages

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D. is a co-founder of Grantibly and a workforce development consultant who develops the workforce through evaluation, training, facilitation, and strategic planning. A sociologist and former faculty member at Savannah State University and Western Kentucky University, she taught more than 50 social research methods courses, mentored more than 21 thesis and dissertation committees, and served on three Institutional Review Boards. Her work helps organizations use evidence to understand what is happening, decide what to do next, and do MORE good.

grantibly.com

Tell us what you're trying to understand

Schedule a consult Meet Lauren and Angelika