Should we upskill the people we have instead of hiring?

Direct Answer

Whether you should upskill the people you have instead of hiring depends on the skills you need, how soon you need them, whether current employees want to learn them and can do so in the time available, and what each option would realistically cost your organization. Upskilling tends to make sense when the skills can be learned on the job or through training, when employees who already know your work and your customers are interested in growing, and when you have enough time and coverage to let them learn. Hiring tends to make sense when you need a skill or credential right away, when the role requires specialized expertise that would take years to build, or when no one on the team wants the role. Many organizations do some of each. Before you decide, make sure you understand the problem you're trying to solve. If you're hiring repeatedly because people keep leaving, neither option addresses why they leave, and it's worth finding that out first.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Co-founder and workforce development consultant, Grantibly

Best Move

For the specific skill or role you need, compare what it would take to develop a current employee with what it would take to recruit, using your own records and estimates.

Why It Works

The right choice depends on the skill, the timeline, and the people involved, and a side-by-side comparison shows the costs of each option, including the ones that don't appear in a training budget.

Next Step

Talk with the supervisors involved about which employees are interested in the role and how much of their current work would need to be covered while they learn.

What you need to know

When does upskilling current employees make more sense than hiring?

Upskilling current employees makes more sense than hiring when the skills you need can be learned in a reasonable amount of time and some of your employees want to learn them. Current employees already understand how your organization works, its processes, and its customers, which a new hire has to learn from scratch. When they can see that the organization is willing to invest in them, it can also give them a path to grow, which matters to many employees. Our people have nowhere to go here. How do we build a career path? covers that side of the question.

Upskilling also depends on capacity. Someone has to cover the employee's work while they learn, and a supervisor or experienced coworker usually has to teach, answer questions, and check the work. If the team is already stretched, adding training without reducing other responsibilities can leave people overwhelmed.

Some upskilling happens best through a college, a training provider, or a credential program rather than inside the organization. We want to upskill our people through a college or training partner. How does that work? covers how those partnerships work.

When is hiring the better choice?

Hiring is the better choice when you need a skill immediately, when the role requires a license, credential, or specialized expertise that would take years to build, or when no one on your current team wants to move into the role. It can also be the better choice when the team can't cover someone's work through a long period of training. Sometimes the organization would benefit from experience gained somewhere else.

Choosing to hire doesn't mean you've given up on developing your own people. Some organizations hire for an immediate need while preparing current employees to take on similar roles in the future. The important thing is to make the decision based on what the role requires and what your employees want, so that people who are interested in growing don't conclude that the organization will always look outside first.

What does upskilling actually cost compared with hiring?

What upskilling costs compared with hiring depends on the role, but both options have costs that are easy to overlook. Upskilling includes the cost of training itself, the employee's time away from their regular work, the cost of covering that work, the time supervisors and coworkers spend teaching, and a period of lower productivity while the employee learns. If the new skills make the employee more valuable, it's also reasonable to expect a change in pay.

Hiring includes recruiting, interviewing, onboarding, and the weeks or months before a new employee is fully productive, plus the risk that the hire doesn't work out. Published estimates of what it costs to replace an employee vary widely. One review by the Center for American Progress found a typical cost of about 21 percent of an employee's annual salary for most jobs, and more for senior or highly specialized roles. Your own records will tell you more than a published figure. What is turnover actually costing us? covers how to estimate those costs for your organization.

Put the two side by side for the specific role, count the same kinds of costs for each, and note which figures are estimates.

How will we know whether upskilling worked?

You'll know whether upskilling worked by deciding beforehand what should be different and checking afterward whether it is. That might mean the employee is using the new skills on the job, the role is filled from within, the work is getting done at the expected quality, or the employees you trained are still with you a year later. Whether employees liked the training is worth knowing, but it doesn't tell you whether it improved what you were trying to improve.

Write down what you expect before the training begins, give it enough time to make a difference, and then look again. If it didn't help, or helped some employees and not others, that's useful information for the next decision. How do I know if our training is worth what we spend on it? covers how to judge a training program, and How do we know whether the change we made actually helped? covers checking a change more generally.

The Grantibly perspective

Lauren's perspective

Organizations invest significant time and money recruiting and training workers, and getting people through the door is only part of the challenge. Before organizations invest in solutions, they need to understand the problem they're actually trying to solve.

One of the questions we want employers to ask is whether there are organizational conditions causing them to continually replace people they have already recruited and trained. Another is whether employees see opportunities to grow.

When the decision is made, the question to come back to is whether the change improved the outcomes you were trying to improve.

More questions about this topic

Will upskilling employees make them more likely to stay?

Upskilling employees may make some of them more likely to stay, especially those who wanted to grow and could see that the organization was willing to invest in them, but no one can promise it. Some employees will use new skills to move elsewhere. If retention is one of your goals, decide in advance how you'll check whether it changed, and look at what else might be affecting whether people stay.

What if we train someone and they leave?

If you train someone and they leave, you lose part of what you invested, and it's worth finding out why they left. If trained employees keep leaving soon after, the reason may be something the training can't fix, such as pay that didn't change with the new skills, a lack of opportunity to use them, or conditions that affect whether anyone stays.

How do we choose which employees to upskill?

Choose which employees to upskill by starting with who is interested and who has the foundation the new skills build on, and by making the opportunity visible to everyone who might qualify. When the selection process is open and the criteria are clear, employees are less likely to see it as favoritism.

Related pages

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D.

Lauren McClain, Ph.D. is a co-founder of Grantibly and a workforce development consultant who develops the workforce through evaluation, training, facilitation, and strategic planning. A sociologist and former faculty member at Savannah State University and Western Kentucky University, she taught more than 50 social research methods courses, mentored more than 21 thesis and dissertation committees, and served on three Institutional Review Boards. Her work helps organizations use evidence to understand what is happening, decide what to do next, and do MORE good.

grantibly.com

Tell us what you're trying to understand

Schedule a consult Meet Lauren and Angelika