Turnover can cost more than what shows up on a single budget line because many of its costs are spread across the organization. Published estimates run from about one-fifth of a worker's annual salary for most jobs to between one-half and two times salary. The range is wide because estimates include different costs, such as recruiting, hiring, training, lost productivity, and time spent covering a vacant position. Those costs vary considerably by job. Some of the costs of turnover are easier to calculate than others. Some can be calculated from records your organization already has, including recruiting, onboarding, training, overtime, and the weeks a position sits open. Other costs are just as real and costly but never appear on an invoice, such as the additional pressure on the employees who remain and the institutional knowledge that leaves with the person. Published estimates can give you a starting point, but your own records can tell you more about what turnover is costing your organization. Start with recent departures and calculate the costs you can document. Then look at where those departures are occurring: by department, role, location, shift, or another meaningful group. That can help you see where turnover is costing you the most and where you may need to start asking why employees are leaving. Knowing the cost tells you how large the problem is. However, it doesn't explain why employees are leaving, and your organization will need to understand that before investing in a solution.
Add up what your most recent departures cost using your own records, then look at where in the organization those departures happened.
Your own records give you a useful estimate of what turnover is costing your organization, and seeing where those costs are concentrated shows you where to start asking why.
Pick one department or role and calculate what it cost to replace the last few employees who left it.
Turnover can mean repeated recruiting, onboarding, and training costs; lost productivity; vacancies; overtime; disruption to teams; lost institutional knowledge; and additional pressure on the employees who remain.
Lauren McClain, Ph.D., Grantibly
When an employee leaves, count what it takes to replace them, and also what the organization loses while the position is open and the new employee is still learning the job. Many organizations track the first category and never calculate the second. Both should be included when estimating what turnover is costing your organization, even if some of the costs have to be estimated.
| Cost | What it includes | Where to look for it |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiting | Advertising, agency fees, and the hours staff spend screening and interviewing | HR records and hiring managers' time |
| Onboarding and training | Orientation, training time, and the hours coworkers spend teaching the job | Training records and supervisors |
| The open position | Overtime, temporary help, and work that is delayed or not done | Payroll and operations |
| Getting up to speed | The weeks or months before a new employee is fully productive | Supervisors' estimates |
| Leaving | Payouts, paperwork, and exit conversations | HR and payroll |
Not every line needs to be exact. Estimate where necessary, document how each estimate was made, and use the same method every time so the figures can be compared across departments and from year to year.
Your turnover-cost number differs from the ones you read online because each published study counts different costs for different kinds of jobs. The Center for American Progress reviewed 30 case studies from 11 research papers. For most jobs, it found a typical cost of about 21 percent of the employee's annual salary. For jobs paying under $30,000 it was 16 percent, and for senior or highly specialized jobs it ran as high as 213 percent.
Gallup gives a wider range. It estimates that replacing an employee costs from one-half to two times the employee's annual salary, and it calls that estimate conservative.
Both numbers can be right, because they measure different things. Your organization's figure will depend on the kinds of positions you're replacing, how long those positions remain open, and how long it takes a new employee to become fully productive. A published range is a reasonable placeholder while you gather your own records, as long as you identify it as a published estimate rather than your organization's actual cost.
Some of the biggest costs of turnover are carried by the employees who remain, and those costs never show up in any budget. When someone leaves, their responsibilities don't disappear. Coworkers cover them, often for months, in addition to their own jobs. That can mean longer hours, more stress, and less room for life outside work for the very employees your organization most wants to keep.
These costs are difficult to express in dollars, but that doesn't make them less important. Don't assign them a dollar amount you can't support. Instead, include them when discussing the full cost of turnover so your leadership team understands that turnover has costs beyond those that can be calculated in dollars. If your employees are already telling you they're stretched, Our people say they have no work-life balance. What can we actually change? looks at what an employer can do about it.
No, knowing what turnover costs doesn't tell you what to fix. It tells you how large the problem is, and it can show you where in the organization the problem is largest, but it can't identify what is causing it. Turnover is an outcome, and the question that matters is what's producing it.
Employees may be leaving because of pay, scheduling, supervision, workload, advancement opportunities, workplace culture, or something else entirely. The reasons may also differ from one department or shift to another. An organization-wide cost figure can hide those differences in the same way an organization-wide turnover rate does.
Examine your cost the same way you would examine turnover itself: by department, shift, facility, role, and how long employees had been with the organization. That comparison shows you where to start asking questions. It still won't explain why employees are leaving, and understanding why comes before choosing a solution.
How to find out is a separate question. Why do good employees keep leaving when we pay competitively? covers the common causes. If you're weighing whether you need someone outside the organization to help, Is our turnover problem worth bringing in outside help? covers that.
We treat workforce development as a business issue as well as a people issue. Turnover means repeated recruiting, onboarding, and training costs, and it also means vacancies, overtime, lost knowledge, and more pressure on the employees who remain. Leaders are right to want a number.
When a leader asks us what an assessment or an initiative will cost, we think there's a second question to ask alongside it. How much will it cost the organization if the turnover continues? Organizations spend a great deal replacing employees they already recruited and trained. Without understanding why those employees are leaving, they may continue spending money on solutions that don't address the reasons people are leaving in the first place.
We also avoid making unsupported promises about return on investment. No one can responsibly tell you in advance how much turnover will drop or how much money you'll save. What good information can do is help you determine where an investment is likely to make a meaningful difference, and where it isn't.
No, there's no standard formula for calculating turnover cost. There are many calculators and formulas, and they count different things, which is one reason published estimates vary so much. What matters more than the formula is consistency: counting the same costs in the same way every time. That allows your organization to compare one year with the next, or one department with another, and it lets your leadership team see how the number was calculated.
If you don't have time to calculate your own number, use a published estimate as a placeholder and say that's what it is. For most jobs, the Center for American Progress review found a typical cost of about one-fifth of annual salary, and more for senior or highly specialized roles. Multiply that by the number of employees who left last year and you have a starting figure. Replace it with your own records when you can, starting with the roles you replace most often.
Count employees you weren't sorry to lose, because replacing them still costs money. But keep them separate when you look at the total. Not every departure is a problem, and the goal isn't to convince unhappy employees to stay in jobs that don't work for them. The cost that deserves attention is the cost of losing employees you wanted to keep, for reasons the organization may be able to change.
No one can promise that reducing turnover will pay for the work of finding out why people leave, and we don't. What you can do is put two numbers side by side: what turnover is costing you now, and what it would cost to find out what's causing it. How the two compare will depend on the size of your organization and how much turnover you have, so it's worth doing the arithmetic before assuming either way.
When you present your turnover number to finance or leadership, show how you got it. List what you counted, what you estimated, and what you left out because it can't be measured well. A figure your leadership team can follow and check will carry more weight than a larger one they can't. Then say what the number doesn't tell you, which is why employees are leaving, and what you would need to find that out.