When your people say they have no work-life balance, your organization may have more control over it than it feels like right now, but first you need to understand what "no balance" means for your employees. Poor work-life balance can have multiple causes, including workload, unpredictable schedules, after-hours expectations, too many meetings, or frequently having to cover for absent coworkers. Those causes can also differ among employees or across the organization. Employees in one department, for instance, may have reasonable workloads but little control over how they do their jobs: they may have little say in how they organize their work, when they take breaks, or how routine decisions are made. Employees in another department may have more autonomy but feel pressure to respond to messages and requests after hours, extending their workday and creating an expectation that they are always available. Often these concerns have to do with norms and expectations known as the culture of the organization. Sometimes workload itself is the problem. When there is more work than employees can reasonably do, the organization may need to reduce or delay some responsibilities, redistribute the work, or add capacity. Before deciding which approach makes sense, look at what employees are actually spending their time on and whether all of that work is necessary. Some responsibilities may be required, while others may be able to happen less often, take less time, move to someone else, or stop altogether. If the amount of work really can't be reduced, then the organization may need to consider whether there are enough people or resources to do it. However, many of the causes of poor work-life balance are within an employer's control and can be addressed without hiring more staff. For example, an employer might give employees more advance notice of their schedules, set limits on after-hours communication, eliminate or shorten meetings, change deadlines, or decide that some work doesn't need to be done at all. Other factors may be outside the organization's control, such as required staffing levels, customer or production demands, regulatory requirements, or fixed operating hours. When factors like those can't change, leaders should explain why rather than leaving employees to assume their concerns were ignored. Employees generally understand that some things are beyond the organization's control, especially when leaders are transparent about why they can't be changed. Leadership can then work with employees to identify changes that might reduce the pressure created by that constraint, even if the constraint itself has to remain. Figuring out what to change begins with understanding what poor work-life balance actually looks like in your organization. Ask employees what is making work-life balance difficult and whether those challenges differ across departments, shifts, or roles. Then make the changes you can, and be honest with employees about what you can't change and why.
Ask employees what is making balance hard for them, and look at the answers by department, shift, and role before you change anything.
"No balance" can mean workload, scheduling, after-hours expectations, or something else, and each one calls for a different change.
Ask employees what is making work-life balance difficult, choose one change you can make based on what employees tell you, and be clear about what you can't change and why.
Work shouldn't leave people too exhausted for the rest of their lives.
Angelika Gulbis, Ph.D., Grantibly
The parts of work-life balance an employer controls are how work is distributed, how predictable schedules are, what is expected outside working hours, and how much autonomy employees have over how they do their jobs. The U.S. Surgeon General's Framework for Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being names four practices under what it calls Work-Life Harmony. Two of them are more autonomy over how work is done and schedules that are as flexible and predictable as possible. The other two are more access to paid leave and respect for boundaries between work and non-work time.
Your organization may not be able to change all of these. Many organizations can change some of them, and employees can help identify which changes would make the biggest difference. .
Find out where employees are struggling most with work-life balance by asking employees directly. Then examine what they tell you by department, shift, role, and length of service instead of as one organization-wide result. Employees at different levels of an organization experience the same policies and practices differently. A schedule that works well for one team can leave another with no room for life outside work.
Asking can take different forms. A short survey, a few focus groups, or individual conversations with supervisors and employees may each be appropriate. The right approach depends on the size of your organization and how comfortable employees are speaking candidly. Who asks matters too. Employees may not tell a supervisor that the supervisor's own expectations are the problem.
Look at the data you already have as well. Overtime records, unused vacation time, schedule changes made on short notice, and absences can indicate where employees are stretched before anyone says so. How do I find out what my employees actually need? covers how to ask so that employees answer candidly.
If the real problem is that there is too much work, the organization needs to address the workload itself. Flexible schedules or better boundaries may help employees in other ways, but they don't reduce the amount of work that needs to get done.
According to Gallup, a study of nearly 7,500 full-time employees found that 23 percent felt burned out at work very often or always, and another 44 percent felt burned out sometimes (Wigert & Agrawal, 2018).
It's important to gather data and ask employees directly what they mean when they say they are burned out or have no work-life balance.
Look at what employees are actually responsible for and how much time that work reasonably requires. Some responsibilities may need to happen less often, take less time, be reassigned, delayed, or eliminated altogether. If the work can't be reduced, the organization may need to add capacity.
If you've already invested in a wellness program and employees are still exhausted, that's a related problem with a different answer. Why isn't our wellness program reducing burnout? covers it.
You'll know whether changes to work-life balance helped by going back to the same employees and the same records you started with. Before you make a change, write down what you expect to be different, such as fewer last-minute schedule changes, less overtime, or fewer employees telling you they're overwhelmed. Give the change enough time to make a difference, which might be a few weeks for a scheduling change or several months for a change in workload. Then ask again and look again.
Tell employees what you found, including when the change didn't help. How do we know whether the change we made actually helped? covers how to do that without making it a large project.
When employees talk about problems at work, these are the things we hear: overwhelm, burnout, stress, no work-life balance, and not feeling valued or appreciated. Those words deserve to be taken seriously. People have one life to live, and their wellbeing, enjoyment, and energy matter.
We approach this as a people, data, and systems problem, which means HR can't solve it alone. When a whole team says they have no balance, the cause is usually something in how the work is organized. That means the organization can examine it and, in many cases, change it.
We don't walk in assuming we already know why your employees are stretched. Our role is to help you find out. We look for strengths as well as problems, because understanding where balance is working can be just as important as understanding where it's breaking down.
Both the employer and the employee have a part in work-life balance, but employers set most of the conditions. An individual employee can't determine their own workload, staffing level, or schedule, and they can't determine what is expected after hours. When many employees in the same organization say they have no balance, it's worth looking at how the work is organized before asking individuals to manage their time better.
Flexible schedules sometimes fix work-life balance: they help when the difficulty is when and where employees work. They do less for employees who simply have too much work, and some jobs can't be made flexible. That's why it's worth finding out what is making balance hard for your employees before choosing a solution.
If you can't afford to hire more people, most of the changes that improve work-life balance don't require hiring. Giving more notice on schedules, setting clear expectations about after-hours messages, reducing meetings, and sharing overflow work more fairly cost little. If the workload is more than your employees can manage, one honest option is to stop or delay some of the work. The other is to explain to employees why that isn't possible yet and when it might be.
Employees may not be honest about work-life balance, particularly if they believe that admitting they're overwhelmed will be held against them. Employees are often more candid when their answers are confidential and when someone other than their supervisor is asking. It also helps to tell them why you're asking and what you plan to do with what you hear.
How quickly employees should expect to see changes depends on the change, so tell them what to expect. Some changes, such as meeting guidelines or after-hours expectations, can happen within a few weeks. Others, like redistributing work or changing how shifts are scheduled, may take a few months depending on the size of your organization. What matters most is that employees hear back about what you learned and what will happen next.