Making your next strategic plan real starts with finding out why the last one ended up in a drawer, and then building the new plan so that every priority has someone responsible for it, clear first steps, near-term milestones, and a regular time when leaders review progress and decide what to adjust. Many plans stall at the handoff from ideas to responsibility. The planning produces priorities, but nobody is named to carry them out, the first steps are unclear, or the plan isn't connected to the budget, the staff time, and the meetings where decisions get made. Ask the staff and board members who were involved last time what happened, since the reasons your plan stalled matter more than the reasons plans stall in general. When we facilitate planning, the work ends with a synthesis of the decisions, an action map, and near-term milestones, so the plan describes what will change and who is responsible for it.
Before you start planning again, ask the people who were involved in the last plan which priorities moved forward, which didn't, and why.
The reasons your last plan stalled tell you what this one has to do differently, whether that's fewer priorities, named responsibility, involving the staff who'll do the work, or a regular review.
Pull out your last plan, mark each priority as done, partly done, or not started, and bring that list to the first planning conversation.
Strategy should make the work more useful and focused, never more abstract.
Angelika Gulbis, Ph.D., Grantibly
Your last strategic plan may have ended up in a drawer for one of several reasons, and the right fix depends on which one applies. Common reasons include:
Your plan may have stalled for more than one of these reasons, or for one that isn't listed. A short conversation with the people who were supposed to carry it out can tell you which applied, and what this plan needs to do differently.
You turn each priority into work someone owns by deciding, before the planning ends, who is responsible for it, what the first steps are, what progress should look like in the next few months, and what resources it will need. An action map puts those decisions in one place. The row below is a made-up example of what one priority might look like for a nonprofit; your own priorities, roles, and timelines will differ.
| Priority | Who is responsible | First steps | Near-term milestone | What it needs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keep more of our volunteers | The volunteer coordinator, with the program director | Ask current and former volunteers why they stay or leave | A summary of what volunteers said, shared with staff by the end of the quarter | Protected time on the coordinator's calendar each month |
Naming a responsible person doesn't mean that person does all the work alone. It means someone is accountable for moving the priority forward, reporting on its progress, and raising problems early. Involve the staff who will carry out each priority in building its row of the action map, because they understand what the work will realistically take and where it competes with what they're already doing.
You keep a strategic plan alive after the planning session by building it into the meetings where your organization already makes decisions, and by reviewing it often enough that it can change when circumstances do. In practice, that can mean a standing item on leadership or board agendas, a regular check on each priority's milestones, and a set time, perhaps each quarter, to determine whether a priority needs more support, a different approach, or to be set aside.
A plan written today describes what you intend to do, and what happens over the next three to five years will differ from it. Staff change, funding changes, and an approach that seemed promising may need to be redesigned once you try it. Adjusting a priority because you learned something can be a sign that the organization is learning from its own work.
Evidence helps with those reviews. If a priority is meant to change something, decide at the start how you'll know whether it did, so the review is based on what's happening as well as on how people feel about it. How do we know whether the change we made actually helped? looks at how to find out. If the meetings where the plan should be reviewed tend to go in circles, Our meetings go in circles and nothing gets decided. What are we doing wrong? covers that problem.
A plan has limited value if it sits in a binder, in the same way that data has limited value if it sits in a report. Useful progress is the goal of strategic planning, and the document is one step toward it.
For us, a plan becomes real when it shows up in how decisions are made, how time and money are spent, and how leaders lead. That requires leaders who are willing to listen, question their own assumptions, acknowledge when part of the plan isn't working, and take responsibility for changing it. It also requires the people throughout the organization to be part of it. Our clients are experts in their work, their people, and their context, and better plans come from combining what they know with a process designed to turn it into priorities, responsibility, and action.
No set number of priorities suits every strategic plan, but a plan should have few enough that your staff can name them and your organization can realistically resource each one. If every priority competes for the same people and the same budget, the plan hasn't yet decided what comes first.
Whether to start over or update the plan you already have depends on why it stalled. If its priorities still fit and the problem was responsibility or follow-through, updating it and adding an action map may be enough. If your organization's situation has changed, or staff never considered the priorities realistic, a new planning process is likely the better choice.
If your staff don't believe this plan will be different, they may be drawing on experience, and telling them it will be different won't change that. Show them instead: share what happened to the last plan, explain what this process will do differently, report back on early milestones, and be honest about what can't change and why.